Why Every Surveyor Should Understand the Difference Between the Code of Measuring Practice and IPMS
- Sarah Chaudhry MBA FRICS
- Jul 27
- 3 min read

Property measurement is one of the most fundamental skills of a surveyor. Whether undertaking a valuation, preparing sales particulars, carrying out a development appraisal or measuring accommodation for lease purposes, accurate and consistent measurement underpins professional advice.
However, one area that often causes confusion—particularly amongst APC and AssocRICS candidates—is the difference between the RICS Code of Measuring Practice and the International Property Measurement Standards (IPMS).
With the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) currently consulting on the 7th Edition of the Code of Measuring Practice, now is an ideal time to revisit these important standards.
Why do measurement standards matter?
Measurements are relied upon by clients, lenders, developers, investors, solicitors and occupiers. A difference in the basis of measurement can lead to different reported floor areas, which may influence:
Property valuations.
Marketing particulars.
Rental assessments.
Development appraisals.
Service charge calculations.
Investment decisions.
For this reason, surveyors must always be clear about which measurement standard has been adopted.
The Code of Measuring Practice
The RICS Code of Measuring Practice has historically been the principal UK standard for measuring property.
It introduced familiar measurement bases including:
Gross External Area (GEA)
Gross Internal Area (GIA)
Net Internal Area (NIA)
These measurements continue to be widely used throughout the UK property industry and remain common within agency, valuation, development and construction work.
Many existing leases, valuation reports and planning documents still refer to these measurement definitions.
International Property Measurement Standards (IPMS)
As property markets have become increasingly global, the need for internationally consistent measurement standards has grown.
The International Property Measurement Standards (IPMS) were developed to create a common language for measuring buildings across different countries.
Rather than using GEA, GIA and NIA, IPMS introduces measurement categories including:
IPMS 1
IPMS 2
IPMS 3
Each serves a different purpose depending upon the type of building and the intended use of the measurement.
The adoption of IPMS allows investors, developers and occupiers operating internationally to compare properties on a consistent basis.
Are GIA and IPMS the same?
No.
This is one of the most common misconceptions encountered during APC interviews.
Gross Internal Area (GIA) is not an IPMS measurement.
Although some measurements may appear similar, they are produced using different measurement methodologies and can produce different floor areas.
A professional surveyor should therefore never state that they have measured a building using "GIA under IPMS."
Instead, they should clearly identify the standard used, for example:
Gross Internal Area (GIA) measured in accordance with the RICS Code of Measuring Practice.
IPMS 2 measured in accordance with the International Property Measurement Standards.
Why this matters for APC candidates
Measurement is frequently examined during the APC and AssocRICS assessment.
Candidates should be able to explain:
The different measurement bases.
Why a particular standard was selected.
The practical implications of using one standard over another.
How different standards may produce different reported floor areas.



Comments